In the position below, Fritz is white and has just played 54.Ke2, it is now black to play. In the game I played Kc3, it then played Ke3, the sequence was then repeated and Fritz claimed a draw by repetition. I was not disappointed as I genuinely thought it was a drawn position. It is not a draw, it is a win for black but I failed to see the winning method.
Tried to post game below which shows how the endgame should have been played but just cannot get it to post at the minute.
I just could not see that it was needful for black to move away to b1 or b2???
I wonder how many club players would have managed to find the win from the position above?
Ecc 12:12 And further, by these, my son, be admonished: of making many books there is no end; and much study is a weariness of the flesh.
Had a quick look at that Chess.com post about alleged "chess-cheating," it seems to be generating lot`s of comments! Thought this was a appropriate tune, suitable for the occasion. I did read an article somewhere quite recently where someone said, "Cheating will not kill Chess but the paranoia it generates will kill Chess."
1 Thessalonians 5:22 Abstain from all appearance of evil.
On the very first day, the principal of the Bible college announced that they had found evidence of cheating during exams, which had taken place at the end of the last College year.
They had to start whole inquiry in order to sort the matter out!
When you get cheating going on in a Bible College, you can be sure it is going on in a widespread fashion in the rest of society.
2 Timothy 2:15 Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.
Photographs can be very interesting don`t you think?
Discovered this photo a few days ago. It was taken in 1982 and it features a man called Michelle Sindona.
The picture was taken in prison, and it look very like Sindona is sending a message to his former colleagues, that he is willing to play "the Cyanide Gambit," in order to escape from his predicament.
"The Cyanide Gambit," is unlike other gambits were you are willing to sacrifice a pawn or a piece.
To play "the Cyanide Gambit" you have to be willing to sacrifice all the pawns, and all the pieces in order to win!
Naturally this would lead to quite a spectacle, and would need superhuman powers of calculation for it to work successfully.
In 1986, Sindona`s game went this way. He made the astounding threat to his former colleagues, that if he was not immediately released from prison, he would publicly reveal the secret financial links between the Mafia and the Vatican.
The gambit did not go the way Sindona expected, a few days after making the threat, he was given a cup of coffee containing cyanide, and it was game, set, and match in the favour of the Vatican and the Mafia.
No one has ever tried to play "the Cyanide Gambit" ever since!
Maybe Gary Kasparov will attempt to play it someday against Vladimir Putin?
If only Michelle Sindona had been able to sharpen his calculating skills a bit more, he may have won?